FB AI--Not Very Intelligent, Or Deliberately Not Intelligent
A Facebook Thread started with:
“Astronomers calculate that approximately three thousand new suns are born every second!!
What!! Wow !!!”
____________
To which someone replied:
“FALSE!!!!! THAT IS SPECULATION. This crazy idea is not scientific, and would be thrown out of any court. God created things in week one, and is done creating the universe and 'suns'"
____________
Response # 1 by the original Poster:
“If its speculation how would YOU know if its true or false? You don't.”
____________
I jumped in with this response to the someone:
“So God's a quitter?”
____________
And the someone continued:
”The scientific evidence proves its false. what is wrong with you people? “
____________
Then the original Poster replied—note that this Comment is still in the thread:
“SCIENCE???!!! THE Same idiots who brought the deathly vaxxes and toxic pharma drugs???????????????”
____________
To which I responded:
“'Idiots'? No, far too much planning and Premeditation went into that. Hang 'em High!!!”
____________________________
FB's automated bots apparently decided that my use of the word “Idiots”, which I put in quotation marks unlike the person whose earlier Comment was not in quotation marks, violated “Community Standards”. While the bot's wording is vague and never states specifically what set its little electrons off, it initially appeared—or claimed to be—concerned about the word “Idiots”.
The automated “Appeal” system asked more questions than usual. This time I was able to check off the box that said the Bot had read the word out of context, and that the Comment was made on a matter important to the public.
The Bot's specific complaint started—which is stark raving lunacy:
“It looks like you shared or sent something that could encourage violence and lead to risk of physical harm, or a direct threat to public safety.”
and continued:
“Your comment goes against our Community Standards on violence and incitement.”
____________________________
The laughable irony, of course, is that I disputed the use of the word “Idiot”, and corrected the language.
By what stretch of the rational imagination does my Comment remotely suggest “violence or incitement” by use of the word “Idiots”? If the gripe was about “Hang 'em High”, which was never cited, then FB has a whole lot of 'splanin' about all the violence they're encouraging, as part of its divide and conquer campaign, in the Middle East. And Ukraine. And I guess we can't discuss history on FB where the precedent was set.
A classic case of, when you read “the rules”, you find that there aren't any rules.
____________
Second laughable irony: The Comment of the person who used the naughty word “Idiot” is still there!
FB wants to promote The Narrative that “mistakes were made”, while it's quite clear that premeditated mass murder was carried out. But allowing my comment that mistakes and errors weren't made, that Crimes Against Humanity were, has its own problems for FB. So what will it be Zunk? Objecting to the inaccurate use of a naughty word—in essence, supporting FB's claimed position is “bad”? But if my objection is good, that allows a “bad truth” to remain.
____________
Third laughable irony: Facebook has been one of the lead perpetrators of biological warfare upon people throughout the world, promoting false information and suppressing/banning accurate information. And then FB pretends to be concerned about “physical harm” and “public safety”? Cheech and Chong never smoked anything so potent that one would believe that one!
____________________________
FB, of course, declined my first Appeal with the following:
How we reviewed your comment
We checked your comment again. As a result, we decided that it does follow our Community Standards.”
There is zero indication or suggestion that my Appeal was reviewed by anything other than a computer bot. No surprise. Rather “in your face we don't care”.As I've said from early on, Facebook is a giant PsyOp, just like Disneyland and much more. But I'll play. And share.
____________________________
My Appeal to the Facebook Appeal Board. I titled it, “Facebook's Automated System Takes "Intelligent" Out Of AI”:
Facebook's computerized "bot" was obviously incapable of reading my usage of the word "Idiot" in context. I was objecting to the usage of the word "Idiot" in an earlier Comment, and pointed out why that word was the wrong one to use. I put "Idiot" in quotation marks to further make my point clear, and clearly articulated myself.
Facebook, rather than improving its software, prefers to harass its consumers with deliberately-poor software.
A simple reading of my Comment by a living breathing human being will show that I violated no "Community Standards" at all.
Meanwhile, it rankles me to no end that hardcore pornography that any child can see is routinely allowed on Facebook, and yet that doesn't violate "Community Standards".
____________________________
This section came up in the course of the Appeal to the “Oversight Board”, which I don't recall seeing to this extent before. As to their questions, I answered “Yes” to both, make the whole damn thing public and let FB humiliate itself. Again:
“The Board will produce a written explanation of its final decision, which will be available for the public to read.
This explanation may include information about you and your content. Where does this information come from?
This explanation may draw interest from the public and members of the press, who may attempt to contact you.
On this page, you’ll make some decisions about what kinds of information about you can be shared in that written explanation.”
____________________________
And now we wait.