Calling Perversion "Perversion" May Get You Sued In Canada

At this point it's just a ruling by one Trial Court Judge, but as we've seen from the ratification system, er "legal system", there's no sound basis for thinking “Justice" or sanity will prevail.

Does it take a psychiatric report before one can conclude that cross-dressers acting out in front of children are indeed "groomers"?

Heck, we could empty the prisons if only a recorded admission/confession would be enough proof of intent.

_______________________________________

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has ruled that referring to drag queens as “groomers” does not fall under Canada’s protected speech laws, setting up potential defamation lawsuits against anyone who uses the term.

The ruling comes in the case of Rainbow Alliance Dryden et al v. Webster, where Justice Nieckarz determined that such statements perpetuate harmful stereotypes and do not constitute expression on a matter of public interest.

[Snip]

The case involves a small-town Pride organization, Rainbow Alliance Dryden (RAD), and a local drag king, who filed a defamation action against Brian Webster, a Thunder Bay Facebook blogger.

Egale Canada, a Trudeau-funded far-left organization, was part of the lawsuit against the defendant who called drag queens groomers.

[Snip]

Justice Nieckarz rejected Webster’s anti-SLAPP [Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participationmotion], emphasizing that the expression did not relate to a matter of public interest, claiming it went beyond critique of a CBC article.

Calling drag queens “Groomers” not protected speech, judge rules